<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Depreciation on CENVAT Credit Starts from Credit Date, Not Receipt; Appeal Allowed Due to Time-Barred Notice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80271</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to use the capital goods - Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) and Rule 4(2) of CCR - Though capital goods received at the same time, Rule 4(2) restricts availment of credit to 50% of duty paid on capital goods in a financial year - Legislature conscious of Rule 4(2) while introducing Rule 3(5A) - Ordinary meaning of &quot;from the date of availing the credit&quot; to be followed - No ambiguity to be read into - Appellant&#039;s calculation applying deductions on 100% from date of availing initial credit incorrect - Time limitation - No wilful suppression of facts established - Appellant paid amount as per their calculation and filed ST3 returns reflecting reversal of credit - Show cause notice time-barred - Appeal allowed on ground of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 09:17:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 09:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Depreciation on CENVAT Credit Starts from Credit Date, Not Receipt; Appeal Allowed Due to Time-Barred Notice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80271</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to use the capital goods - Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) and Rule 4(2) of CCR - Though capital goods received at the same time, Rule 4(2) restricts availment of credit to 50% of duty paid on capital goods in a financial year - Legislature conscious of Rule 4(2) while introducing Rule 3(5A) - Ordinary meaning of &quot;from the date of availing the credit&quot; to be followed - No ambiguity to be read into - Appellant&#039;s calculation applying deductions on 100% from date of availing initial credit incorrect - Time limitation - No wilful suppression of facts established - Appellant paid amount as per their calculation and filed ST3 returns reflecting reversal of credit - Show cause notice time-barred - Appeal allowed on ground of limitation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 09:17:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>