Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on export of goods u/s 16(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner furnished Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) evidencing realization of sale proceeds, and the application for refund could not be rejected solely on the ground of non-production of BRCs within nine months. Regarding furnishing bank statements and ledger accounts of suppliers, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh whether the petitioner made payment to suppliers for inward supplies against which refund of accumulated ITC is claimed.
The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on export of goods u/s 16(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner furnished Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) evidencing realization of sale proceeds, and the application for refund could not be rejected solely on the ground of non-production of BRCs within nine months. Regarding furnishing bank statements and ledger accounts of suppliers, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh whether the petitioner made payment to suppliers for inward supplies against which refund of accumulated ITC is claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
