Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on export of goods u/s 16(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner furnished Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) evidencing realization of sale proceeds, and the application for refund could not be rejected solely on the ground of non-production of BRCs within nine months. Regarding furnishing bank statements and ledger accounts of suppliers, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh whether the petitioner made payment to suppliers for inward supplies against which refund of accumulated ITC is claimed.
The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on export of goods u/s 16(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner furnished Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) evidencing realization of sale proceeds, and the application for refund could not be rejected solely on the ground of non-production of BRCs within nine months. Regarding furnishing bank statements and ledger accounts of suppliers, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh whether the petitioner made payment to suppliers for inward supplies against which refund of accumulated ITC is claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
