Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CIT (Appeals) correctly invoked Section 45(4) to tax the increase in partners' capital accounts due to revaluation of firm assets, as this constitutes transfer of capital assets by the firm. The Supreme Court in Mansukh Dyeing case held revaluation and crediting partners' accounts is a transfer u/s 45(4). However, the CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the revalued amount as full value of consideration u/s 48. Fair market value on the transfer date should be considered, which the assessee proved as Rs. 7 lakh per acre based on Sub-Registrar's certificate. Capital gains are to be computed u/s 45(4) using this fair market value. The matter was decided partly in favor of the assessee.
The CIT (Appeals) correctly invoked Section 45(4) to tax the increase in partners' capital accounts due to revaluation of firm assets, as this constitutes transfer of capital assets by the firm. The Supreme Court in Mansukh Dyeing case held revaluation and crediting partners' accounts is a transfer u/s 45(4). However, the CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the revalued amount as full value of consideration u/s 48. Fair market value on the transfer date should be considered, which the assessee proved as Rs. 7 lakh per acre based on Sub-Registrar's certificate. Capital gains are to be computed u/s 45(4) using this fair market value. The matter was decided partly in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
