Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 3, 2024Case LawsHC
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
