Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot be reopened u/s 153A without relevant seized material. Assessing Officer directed to examine relevance of seized material for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. Jurisdiction u/s 132(1) upheld considering retrospective amendment. Assessee entitled to revise position, additions cannot be solely based on statement u/s 132(4) without corroborative evidence. Additional evidence admitted, Assessing Officer to re-examine in light of new evidence. Approval u/s 153D not found mechanical. Notice u/s 153A for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 may be barred by limitation, matter restored to Assessing Officer to decide after examining handover date of seized documents.
Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot be reopened u/s 153A without relevant seized material. Assessing Officer directed to examine relevance of seized material for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. Jurisdiction u/s 132(1) upheld considering retrospective amendment. Assessee entitled to revise position, additions cannot be solely based on statement u/s 132(4) without corroborative evidence. Additional evidence admitted, Assessing Officer to re-examine in light of new evidence. Approval u/s 153D not found mechanical. Notice u/s 153A for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 may be barred by limitation, matter restored to Assessing Officer to decide after examining handover date of seized documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.