<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessments u/s 153A Need Incriminating Material; Reopening Requires Seized Evidence, Not Just Statements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80031</link>
    <description>Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot be reopened u/s 153A without relevant seized material. Assessing Officer directed to examine relevance of seized material for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. Jurisdiction u/s 132(1) upheld considering retrospective amendment. Assessee entitled to revise position, additions cannot be solely based on statement u/s 132(4) without corroborative evidence. Additional evidence admitted, Assessing Officer to re-examine in light of new evidence. Approval u/s 153D not found mechanical. Notice u/s 153A for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 may be barred by limitation, matter restored to Assessing Officer to decide after examining handover date of seized documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:12:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessments u/s 153A Need Incriminating Material; Reopening Requires Seized Evidence, Not Just Statements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80031</link>
      <description>Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot be reopened u/s 153A without relevant seized material. Assessing Officer directed to examine relevance of seized material for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. Jurisdiction u/s 132(1) upheld considering retrospective amendment. Assessee entitled to revise position, additions cannot be solely based on statement u/s 132(4) without corroborative evidence. Additional evidence admitted, Assessing Officer to re-examine in light of new evidence. Approval u/s 153D not found mechanical. Notice u/s 153A for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 may be barred by limitation, matter restored to Assessing Officer to decide after examining handover date of seized documents.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:12:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>