Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm. Mastermind partner admitted purchasing prime material, selling locally on cash basis, passing CENVAT Credit to manufacturers by misdescribing goods as "scrap". Other partner admitted taking CENVAT Credit on "scrap" described as "prime finished goods" in invoices. Appellant voluntarily debited CENVAT Credit before partner's statement, not retracting statement. Burden of proof regarding admissibility of CENVAT Credit lies with manufacturer as per Rules. No infirmity in impugned order, appeal dismissed.
CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm. Mastermind partner admitted purchasing prime material, selling locally on cash basis, passing CENVAT Credit to manufacturers by misdescribing goods as "scrap". Other partner admitted taking CENVAT Credit on "scrap" described as "prime finished goods" in invoices. Appellant voluntarily debited CENVAT Credit before partner's statement, not retracting statement. Burden of proof regarding admissibility of CENVAT Credit lies with manufacturer as per Rules. No infirmity in impugned order, appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
