<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invoices sans supply,CENVAT misuse.Partner confessed fraud.Pre-emptive reversal,no retraction.Burden on manufacturer.Order upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79973</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm. Mastermind partner admitted purchasing prime material, selling locally on cash basis, passing CENVAT Credit to manufacturers by misdescribing goods as &quot;scrap&quot;. Other partner admitted taking CENVAT Credit on &quot;scrap&quot; described as &quot;prime finished goods&quot; in invoices. Appellant voluntarily debited CENVAT Credit before partner&#039;s statement, not retracting statement. Burden of proof regarding admissibility of CENVAT Credit lies with manufacturer as per Rules. No infirmity in impugned order, appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:31:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invoices sans supply,CENVAT misuse.Partner confessed fraud.Pre-emptive reversal,no retraction.Burden on manufacturer.Order upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79973</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm. Mastermind partner admitted purchasing prime material, selling locally on cash basis, passing CENVAT Credit to manufacturers by misdescribing goods as &quot;scrap&quot;. Other partner admitted taking CENVAT Credit on &quot;scrap&quot; described as &quot;prime finished goods&quot; in invoices. Appellant voluntarily debited CENVAT Credit before partner&#039;s statement, not retracting statement. Burden of proof regarding admissibility of CENVAT Credit lies with manufacturer as per Rules. No infirmity in impugned order, appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:31:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>