Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
