<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT(Appeals) erred in dismissing appeal without considering merits despite assessee&#039;s participation. Order set aside for disposal on merits.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79891</link>
    <description>CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT(Appeals) erred in dismissing appeal without considering merits despite assessee&#039;s participation. Order set aside for disposal on merits.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79891</link>
      <description>CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>