Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to address specific issue raised by assessee, merely dismissing appeal without considering merits. u/s 251(1)(a), (b) and Explanation to Section 251(2), CIT(Appeals) is statutorily obligated to apply mind to all issues arising from impugned order. CIT(Appeals) lacks power to summarily dismiss appeal for non-prosecution, as per Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) judgment. Therefore, CIT(Appeals) order set aside with direction to dispose appeal on merits after providing reasonable opportunity to assessee to substantiate claim with evidence. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.