Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Mandatory requirements contemplated in Act for invoking proviso to Section 73(1) stated in show cause notice regarding petitioner's liability for service tax and penalties. After show cause notice under proviso, inquiry conducted, and opportunity given for reply, grounds urged by petitioner to be challenged through appeal under Act instead of challenging jurisdiction for issuance. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 not entertainable when efficacious statutory appeal remedy available u/s 85. No cogent reasons shown for revenue not providing sufficient cause to invoke extended limitation period. Petition dismissed.
Mandatory requirements contemplated in Act for invoking proviso to Section 73(1) stated in show cause notice regarding petitioner's liability for service tax and penalties. After show cause notice under proviso, inquiry conducted, and opportunity given for reply, grounds urged by petitioner to be challenged through appeal under Act instead of challenging jurisdiction for issuance. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 not entertainable when efficacious statutory appeal remedy available u/s 85. No cogent reasons shown for revenue not providing sufficient cause to invoke extended limitation period. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
