Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
