<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input Tax Credit Claim Remanded for Reassessment; Appellate Authority to Specify Required Transaction Documents.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79843</link>
    <description>Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority&#039;s order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority&#039;s observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:04:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input Tax Credit Claim Remanded for Reassessment; Appellate Authority to Specify Required Transaction Documents.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79843</link>
      <description>Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority&#039;s order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority&#039;s observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:04:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>