Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
