Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Inadmissible ITC utilization from cancelled suppliers - petitioner disclosed inward tax supply invoices, party ledger, bank statements, GSTR-2A and e-waybills for supplies allegedly made by a supplier during September-October 2017. Although petitioner discharged initial burden of proof, appellate authority found petitioner ineligible for ITC without specifying documents required to establish transaction genuineness. Appellate authority's order suffered from non-application of mind, being verbatim reproduction of adjudicating authority's observations. Matter remanded to appellate authority to reconsider issue of movement of goods and indicate documents petitioner required to disclose for establishing transaction genuineness. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
