Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
