Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
