Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and confirmations, even if details of immovable property transaction were unavailable. The assessee was not the owner of unrecorded assets, satisfying Section 69A conditions. CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition after considering all aspects. Addition of Rs. 1.70 crores relating to Outstripe Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. transaction was part of Rs. 2 crores addition for the same transaction in the previous year, leading to double addition, hence rightly deleted by CIT(A).
Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and confirmations, even if details of immovable property transaction were unavailable. The assessee was not the owner of unrecorded assets, satisfying Section 69A conditions. CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition after considering all aspects. Addition of Rs. 1.70 crores relating to Outstripe Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. transaction was part of Rs. 2 crores addition for the same transaction in the previous year, leading to double addition, hence rightly deleted by CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
