Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and confirmations, even if details of immovable property transaction were unavailable. The assessee was not the owner of unrecorded assets, satisfying Section 69A conditions. CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition after considering all aspects. Addition of Rs. 1.70 crores relating to Outstripe Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. transaction was part of Rs. 2 crores addition for the same transaction in the previous year, leading to double addition, hence rightly deleted by CIT(A).
Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and confirmations, even if details of immovable property transaction were unavailable. The assessee was not the owner of unrecorded assets, satisfying Section 69A conditions. CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition after considering all aspects. Addition of Rs. 1.70 crores relating to Outstripe Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. transaction was part of Rs. 2 crores addition for the same transaction in the previous year, leading to double addition, hence rightly deleted by CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
