Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.