Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.