Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance. CIT(A) order attained finality on this issue. Post CIT(A) order, AO cannot rectify u/s 154 in absence of mistake apparent from record. CIT(A) order upheld, Revenue's appeal dismissed.
AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance. CIT(A) order attained finality on this issue. Post CIT(A) order, AO cannot rectify u/s 154 in absence of mistake apparent from record. CIT(A) order upheld, Revenue's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
