Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A - third respondent failed to discuss petitioner's explanation for classifying product as farm tractor or record reasons for rejecting such explanation - regarding ITC mismatch, petitioner referred to issuance of invoices after financial year-end, but third respondent erroneously recorded petitioner's contention as ITC matching not being mandatory requirement - impugned order partly set aside concerning ITC mismatch and rate of tax difference/classification issues - third respondent directed to provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue fresh order within three months - petition disposed of.
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A - third respondent failed to discuss petitioner's explanation for classifying product as farm tractor or record reasons for rejecting such explanation - regarding ITC mismatch, petitioner referred to issuance of invoices after financial year-end, but third respondent erroneously recorded petitioner's contention as ITC matching not being mandatory requirement - impugned order partly set aside concerning ITC mismatch and rate of tax difference/classification issues - third respondent directed to provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue fresh order within three months - petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
