<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner&#039;s Natural Justice Violation: Court Orders Fresh Review on ITC Mismatch and Tax Classification Issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79646</link>
    <description>Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner&#039;s contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner&#039;s GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A - third respondent failed to discuss petitioner&#039;s explanation for classifying product as farm tractor or record reasons for rejecting such explanation - regarding ITC mismatch, petitioner referred to issuance of invoices after financial year-end, but third respondent erroneously recorded petitioner&#039;s contention as ITC matching not being mandatory requirement - impugned order partly set aside concerning ITC mismatch and rate of tax difference/classification issues - third respondent directed to provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue fresh order within three months - petition disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:51:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner&#039;s Natural Justice Violation: Court Orders Fresh Review on ITC Mismatch and Tax Classification Issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79646</link>
      <description>Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner&#039;s contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner&#039;s GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A - third respondent failed to discuss petitioner&#039;s explanation for classifying product as farm tractor or record reasons for rejecting such explanation - regarding ITC mismatch, petitioner referred to issuance of invoices after financial year-end, but third respondent erroneously recorded petitioner&#039;s contention as ITC matching not being mandatory requirement - impugned order partly set aside concerning ITC mismatch and rate of tax difference/classification issues - third respondent directed to provide reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and issue fresh order within three months - petition disposed of.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:51:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>