Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A and Central Government notification dated March 29, 2022. Relying on Hexaware Technologies Ltd. decision, High Court ruled that JAO lacked authority to issue impugned notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. Petition was allowed in favor of assessee.
Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A and Central Government notification dated March 29, 2022. Relying on Hexaware Technologies Ltd. decision, High Court ruled that JAO lacked authority to issue impugned notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. Petition was allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.