Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Refusal of MESI benefits violated Article 14's doctrine of equality. Conversion of Shipping Bills from one scheme to another was allowed by the learned Single Judge. The contention that the digitally handled scheme precludes human intervention and error rectification was deemed too far-fetched. In human institutions, errors occur and need rectification in the absence of contrary law. Innocuous errors disadvantaging citizens cannot be justified in a Welfare State. No rule prescribes a limitation period prohibiting condonation of delay. The Appeal lacking merits was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.