Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn't cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue's allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority's orders.
Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn't cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue's allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority's orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
