Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Appellant's challenge to Liquidator's forfeiture of Rs.96 lakh EMD for non-payment of balance amount within stipulated timeline after e-auction of assets was dismissed. E-auction process document clearly allowed forfeiture if successful bidder failed to make complete payment within 90 days. Appellant breached terms by non-payment despite Liquidator's reminders. Issuance of sale certificate was subject to NCLT/NCLAT orders, and delay wasn't Liquidator's deficiency. Appellant wasn't entitled to EMD refund or compensation as claimed. Adjudicating Authority's order upholding Liquidator's actions was upheld.
Appellant's challenge to Liquidator's forfeiture of Rs.96 lakh EMD for non-payment of balance amount within stipulated timeline after e-auction of assets was dismissed. E-auction process document clearly allowed forfeiture if successful bidder failed to make complete payment within 90 days. Appellant breached terms by non-payment despite Liquidator's reminders. Issuance of sale certificate was subject to NCLT/NCLAT orders, and delay wasn't Liquidator's deficiency. Appellant wasn't entitled to EMD refund or compensation as claimed. Adjudicating Authority's order upholding Liquidator's actions was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
