<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>EMD forfeiture upheld for non-payment after e-auction; bidder breached terms despite reminders. Sale certificate subject to tribunal orders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79492</link>
    <description>Appellant&#039;s challenge to Liquidator&#039;s forfeiture of Rs.96 lakh EMD for non-payment of balance amount within stipulated timeline after e-auction of assets was dismissed. E-auction process document clearly allowed forfeiture if successful bidder failed to make complete payment within 90 days. Appellant breached terms by non-payment despite Liquidator&#039;s reminders. Issuance of sale certificate was subject to NCLT/NCLAT orders, and delay wasn&#039;t Liquidator&#039;s deficiency. Appellant wasn&#039;t entitled to EMD refund or compensation as claimed. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order upholding Liquidator&#039;s actions was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>EMD forfeiture upheld for non-payment after e-auction; bidder breached terms despite reminders. Sale certificate subject to tribunal orders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79492</link>
      <description>Appellant&#039;s challenge to Liquidator&#039;s forfeiture of Rs.96 lakh EMD for non-payment of balance amount within stipulated timeline after e-auction of assets was dismissed. E-auction process document clearly allowed forfeiture if successful bidder failed to make complete payment within 90 days. Appellant breached terms by non-payment despite Liquidator&#039;s reminders. Issuance of sale certificate was subject to NCLT/NCLAT orders, and delay wasn&#039;t Liquidator&#039;s deficiency. Appellant wasn&#039;t entitled to EMD refund or compensation as claimed. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order upholding Liquidator&#039;s actions was upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>