Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Royalty receipts were subject to transfer pricing adjustment by TPO on basis of differences in amounts reflected in Form 3CEB of assessee vis-Ã -vis its group entities, without computing ALP by prescribed methods u/s 92C. TPO's approach of determining ALP merely based on differences in reporting by assessee and AEs, without considering functions, assets, risks involved in transactions, is ad-hoc and contrary to transfer pricing provisions. TPO must determine ALP by following prescribed methods; additions cannot be made on ad-hoc basis. Differences arose due to timing of revenue recognition under US GAAP followed by assessee. Major differences were reconciled; remaining differences were minimal, not warranting income addition. TPO's approach was held unsustainable in law.
Royalty receipts were subject to transfer pricing adjustment by TPO on basis of differences in amounts reflected in Form 3CEB of assessee vis-Ã -vis its group entities, without computing ALP by prescribed methods u/s 92C. TPO's approach of determining ALP merely based on differences in reporting by assessee and AEs, without considering functions, assets, risks involved in transactions, is ad-hoc and contrary to transfer pricing provisions. TPO must determine ALP by following prescribed methods; additions cannot be made on ad-hoc basis. Differences arose due to timing of revenue recognition under US GAAP followed by assessee. Major differences were reconciled; remaining differences were minimal, not warranting income addition. TPO's approach was held unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.