<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s Method Ruled Unsustainable for Ignoring Prescribed ALP Computation in Royalty Discrepancy Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79464</link>
    <description>Royalty receipts were subject to transfer pricing adjustment by TPO on basis of differences in amounts reflected in Form 3CEB of assessee vis-Ã -vis its group entities, without computing ALP by prescribed methods u/s 92C. TPO&#039;s approach of determining ALP merely based on differences in reporting by assessee and AEs, without considering functions, assets, risks involved in transactions, is ad-hoc and contrary to transfer pricing provisions. TPO must determine ALP by following prescribed methods; additions cannot be made on ad-hoc basis. Differences arose due to timing of revenue recognition under US GAAP followed by assessee. Major differences were reconciled; remaining differences were minimal, not warranting income addition. TPO&#039;s approach was held unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:05:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s Method Ruled Unsustainable for Ignoring Prescribed ALP Computation in Royalty Discrepancy Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79464</link>
      <description>Royalty receipts were subject to transfer pricing adjustment by TPO on basis of differences in amounts reflected in Form 3CEB of assessee vis-Ã -vis its group entities, without computing ALP by prescribed methods u/s 92C. TPO&#039;s approach of determining ALP merely based on differences in reporting by assessee and AEs, without considering functions, assets, risks involved in transactions, is ad-hoc and contrary to transfer pricing provisions. TPO must determine ALP by following prescribed methods; additions cannot be made on ad-hoc basis. Differences arose due to timing of revenue recognition under US GAAP followed by assessee. Major differences were reconciled; remaining differences were minimal, not warranting income addition. TPO&#039;s approach was held unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:05:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>