Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension. Appellant admitted contravention for one consignment but challenged disproportionate penalty of Rs. 50 lacs compared to Rs. 45 lacs on main defaulter. AT found collusion between appellant and others in making exports and receiving incentives. While upholding contravention, AT reduced appellant's penalty to Rs. 14 lacs from Rs. 50 lacs, considering already deposited Rs. 6 lacs, to maintain rationality with penalty on main defaulter. Appeal partly allowed.
Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension. Appellant admitted contravention for one consignment but challenged disproportionate penalty of Rs. 50 lacs compared to Rs. 45 lacs on main defaulter. AT found collusion between appellant and others in making exports and receiving incentives. While upholding contravention, AT reduced appellant's penalty to Rs. 14 lacs from Rs. 50 lacs, considering already deposited Rs. 6 lacs, to maintain rationality with penalty on main defaulter. Appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
