Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension. Appellant admitted contravention for one consignment but challenged disproportionate penalty of Rs. 50 lacs compared to Rs. 45 lacs on main defaulter. AT found collusion between appellant and others in making exports and receiving incentives. While upholding contravention, AT reduced appellant's penalty to Rs. 14 lacs from Rs. 50 lacs, considering already deposited Rs. 6 lacs, to maintain rationality with penalty on main defaulter. Appeal partly allowed.
Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension. Appellant admitted contravention for one consignment but challenged disproportionate penalty of Rs. 50 lacs compared to Rs. 45 lacs on main defaulter. AT found collusion between appellant and others in making exports and receiving incentives. While upholding contravention, AT reduced appellant's penalty to Rs. 14 lacs from Rs. 50 lacs, considering already deposited Rs. 6 lacs, to maintain rationality with penalty on main defaulter. Appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
