Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, alleging AO didn't inquire about surrendered income's nature. ITAT held PCIT's finding unsustainable as AO conducted due inquiry, assessee voluntarily surrendered professional receipts, disclosed and audited them, and AO's acceptance accorded with judicial precedents. PCIT didn't examine survey records to substantiate error, merely stating AO didn't inquire without evidence. ITAT ruled PCIT lacked valid jurisdiction for revision.
Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, alleging AO didn't inquire about surrendered income's nature. ITAT held PCIT's finding unsustainable as AO conducted due inquiry, assessee voluntarily surrendered professional receipts, disclosed and audited them, and AO's acceptance accorded with judicial precedents. PCIT didn't examine survey records to substantiate error, merely stating AO didn't inquire without evidence. ITAT ruled PCIT lacked valid jurisdiction for revision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.