<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee surrendered unaccounted professional receipts during survey. AO accepted it as taxable income, PCIT&#039;s revision unsustainable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79435</link>
    <description>Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, alleging AO didn&#039;t inquire about surrendered income&#039;s nature. ITAT held PCIT&#039;s finding unsustainable as AO conducted due inquiry, assessee voluntarily surrendered professional receipts, disclosed and audited them, and AO&#039;s acceptance accorded with judicial precedents. PCIT didn&#039;t examine survey records to substantiate error, merely stating AO didn&#039;t inquire without evidence. ITAT ruled PCIT lacked valid jurisdiction for revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:36:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee surrendered unaccounted professional receipts during survey. AO accepted it as taxable income, PCIT&#039;s revision unsustainable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79435</link>
      <description>Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, alleging AO didn&#039;t inquire about surrendered income&#039;s nature. ITAT held PCIT&#039;s finding unsustainable as AO conducted due inquiry, assessee voluntarily surrendered professional receipts, disclosed and audited them, and AO&#039;s acceptance accorded with judicial precedents. PCIT didn&#039;t examine survey records to substantiate error, merely stating AO didn&#039;t inquire without evidence. ITAT ruled PCIT lacked valid jurisdiction for revision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:36:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>