Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The High Court held that the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) is empowered to take disciplinary action against Chartered Accountant firms for professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and not just against individual members. Sections 21A and 21B of the Act, along with Rule 8 of the 2007 Rules, enable the ICAI's Disciplinary Committee to issue notices to firms and hold them accountable for alleged misconduct, particularly in cases involving long-term arrangements or agreements spanning multiple individuals. If no specific member assumes responsibility, the firm as a whole shall be held responsible. The Court emphasized the need for robust disciplinary mechanisms against firms to enhance accountability and transparency in the profession. The writ petitions challenging the ICAI's authority were dismissed with costs, and the ICAI was directed to proceed in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.