Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 33 of IBC bars institution of new suits during liquidation process, but allows continuation of pending suits/proceedings, unlike Section 14 which prohibits both. Respondent unlawfully adjusted ITR amount against pre-CIRP tax dues without filing claim before Liquidator, despite public announcement. ITR amount was part of liquidation estate, and adjustment violated rights of other stakeholders. Matter remanded to examine quantum of set-off allowed against Respondent's claim entitlement in liquidation proceedings.
Section 33 of IBC bars institution of new suits during liquidation process, but allows continuation of pending suits/proceedings, unlike Section 14 which prohibits both. Respondent unlawfully adjusted ITR amount against pre-CIRP tax dues without filing claim before Liquidator, despite public announcement. ITR amount was part of liquidation estate, and adjustment violated rights of other stakeholders. Matter remanded to examine quantum of set-off allowed against Respondent's claim entitlement in liquidation proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.