Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator acting beyond jurisdiction by awarding components barred by agreement between parties, and patent illegality. HC held that arbitrator being creature of contract is bound by agreement's terms, and award violating contractual bar is beyond jurisdiction requiring court's interference. Impugned arbitral award dated September 24, 2020 set aside, application allowed.
Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator acting beyond jurisdiction by awarding components barred by agreement between parties, and patent illegality. HC held that arbitrator being creature of contract is bound by agreement's terms, and award violating contractual bar is beyond jurisdiction requiring court's interference. Impugned arbitral award dated September 24, 2020 set aside, application allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.