Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless assessment scheme notified u/s 151A mandates automated allocation and faceless assessment u/s 144B. JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice outside faceless assessment procedure. Assessing Officer also failed to consider assessee's submission regarding project completion method while reopening assessment. Assessee's appeal allowed by High Court on grounds of invalidity of notice and non-consideration of submissions.
Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless assessment scheme notified u/s 151A mandates automated allocation and faceless assessment u/s 144B. JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice outside faceless assessment procedure. Assessing Officer also failed to consider assessee's submission regarding project completion method while reopening assessment. Assessee's appeal allowed by High Court on grounds of invalidity of notice and non-consideration of submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.