Effective hearing in GST adjudication requires actual opportunity to respond; ineffective service through a former auditor invalidated ex parte procee...
Third-party search material requires special assessment route, rendering general reassessment notices without jurisdiction when it forms the proceedin...
Transfer-pricing adjustments must be confined to international associated-enterprise transactions, while functionally dissimilar comparables remain ex...
Insolvency moratorium bars income-tax revision proceedings against corporate debtors until the moratorium ends, preserving merits for later determinat...
Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless assessment scheme notified u/s 151A mandates automated allocation and faceless assessment u/s 144B. JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice outside faceless assessment procedure. Assessing Officer also failed to consider assessee's submission regarding project completion method while reopening assessment. Assessee's appeal allowed by High Court on grounds of invalidity of notice and non-consideration of submissions.
Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless assessment scheme notified u/s 151A mandates automated allocation and faceless assessment u/s 144B. JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice outside faceless assessment procedure. Assessing Officer also failed to consider assessee's submission regarding project completion method while reopening assessment. Assessee's appeal allowed by High Court on grounds of invalidity of notice and non-consideration of submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
