Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Amounts received by the appellant company from Offshore Supply Contracts were held not liable to tax in India u/s 44BBB. The Coordinate Bench consistently held that receipts towards offshore supply contracts cannot form part of business income chargeable u/s 44BBB, even if certain functions were required to be performed after equipment sale. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld this position, disallowing the departmental representative's contention as an attempt to improve the assessing officer's case. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Amounts received by the appellant company from Offshore Supply Contracts were held not liable to tax in India u/s 44BBB. The Coordinate Bench consistently held that receipts towards offshore supply contracts cannot form part of business income chargeable u/s 44BBB, even if certain functions were required to be performed after equipment sale. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld this position, disallowing the departmental representative's contention as an attempt to improve the assessing officer's case. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.