Non-resident company's offshore supply contract receipts not taxable under section 44BBB despite composite contract nature

The ITAT Mumbai held that amounts received by a non-resident company under offshore supply contracts are not taxable in India under section 44BBB. The tribunal followed its consistent precedent from earlier assessment years, ruling that offshore supply contract receipts cannot form part of business income chargeable under section 44BBB. Despite the composite nature of the contract requiring post-sale functions, income from offshore equipment supply remained non-taxable in India. The revenue's alternative argument regarding service contract taxation under section 44BB was rejected as an impermissible attempt to improve the assessment officer's case. The assessee's appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of payment received under Offshore Supply Contracts.
2. Applicability of section 44BBB to the Offshore Supply Contracts.
3. Charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Payment Received under Offshore Supply Contracts:
The primary issue revolves around the taxability of Rs. 3267,27,22,775 received by the assessee from Offshore Supply Contracts. The Assessing Officer (AO) included this amount as taxable income under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld this addition, relying on its own orders from previous assessment years. The assessee argued that the receipts from Offshore Supply Contracts should not be taxable in India, citing previous Tribunal decisions in its favor for earlier assessment years. The Tribunal noted that the Co-ordinate Bench had consistently held that receipts from Offshore Supply Contracts do not form part of business receipts for computation of income under section 44BBB. The Tribunal reaffirmed that the income from Offshore Supply Contracts, being concluded outside India, does not accrue or arise in India and hence, is not taxable under section 44BBB.

2. Applicability of Section 44BBB to the Offshore Supply Contracts:
The Tribunal examined the nature of section 44BBB, which deals with the computation of profits and gains of foreign companies engaged in civil construction or erection of plant and machinery in connection with turnkey power projects. The Tribunal reiterated that section 44BBB is a computational provision and does not expand the scope of total income beyond what is provided in sections 4, 5, and 9 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal cited various judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Ishikawajma-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd., to support its conclusion that only income attributable to operations carried out in India is taxable. Since the Offshore Supply Contracts were carried out and concluded outside India, the income from these contracts does not fall under section 44BBB.

3. Charging of Interest under Sections 234A and 234B:
The assessee contested the charging of interest under sections 234A (Rs. 4.57,92,447) and 234B (Rs. 38,92,35,799). The Tribunal did not delve into detailed discussions on these points, as the primary focus was on the taxability of the Offshore Supply Contracts. However, since the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the exclusion of Offshore Supply Contracts from taxable income, the consequential relief from interest under sections 234A and 234B would follow.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the receipts from Offshore Supply Contracts do not form part of the business receipts for computation of income under section 44BBB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also rejected the Departmental Representative's (DR) alternate plea to tax the service contract income as fees for technical services, noting that this issue was not raised before the lower authorities or the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to recompute the assessee's income excluding the Offshore Supply Contracts from the taxable income under section 44BBB.

---