Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Faceless Assessment Unit failed to offer personal hearing opportunity through video conferencing despite petitioner's request as mandated u/s 144B(6)(viii). Petitioner's request approved but no video link shared. Mere creation of meeting ID/link without sharing insufficient to discharge statutory obligation. Faceless Assessment Unit's finding that petitioner chose not to attend video conference perverse, based on no evidence. Order dated 29th March 2024 vitiated for not affording personal hearing, set aside. Matter remanded to Faceless Assessment Unit with directions.
Faceless Assessment Unit failed to offer personal hearing opportunity through video conferencing despite petitioner's request as mandated u/s 144B(6)(viii). Petitioner's request approved but no video link shared. Mere creation of meeting ID/link without sharing insufficient to discharge statutory obligation. Faceless Assessment Unit's finding that petitioner chose not to attend video conference perverse, based on no evidence. Order dated 29th March 2024 vitiated for not affording personal hearing, set aside. Matter remanded to Faceless Assessment Unit with directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
