Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Assignment of contractual receipt by JV to one partner for project execution is not incurrence of expenditure. JV not required to make total payment of actual contract receipt to partner. AO incorrectly interpreted contract assignment as expenditure for availing partner's services. Contract cost cannot be construed as expenditure, it's project execution cost. AO cannot assume partner could have executed work at less cost in open market. No profit element for JV in contract assignment to partner. CIT(A) order in AY 2011-12 accepted by Revenue, hence a covered issue in assessee's favor. Assessee's minimum expenses for existence allowed, losses allowed to be carried forward. Appeals allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
