Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax dues but have no authority to initiate recovery of such dues during the moratorium period under IBC. Income Tax Authorities are like creditors and may stake their claim before the liquidator or adjudicatory authority within the statutory limitation period under the waterfall mechanism of IBC. However, they are not barred from determining the tax dues for staking claims. CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the issue on merit regarding determination of tax dues, despite the pendency of liquidation process. The case deserves to be restored to CIT(A) for disposal on merits.
The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax dues but have no authority to initiate recovery of such dues during the moratorium period under IBC. Income Tax Authorities are like creditors and may stake their claim before the liquidator or adjudicatory authority within the statutory limitation period under the waterfall mechanism of IBC. However, they are not barred from determining the tax dues for staking claims. CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the issue on merit regarding determination of tax dues, despite the pendency of liquidation process. The case deserves to be restored to CIT(A) for disposal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.