Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax dues but have no authority to initiate recovery of such dues during the moratorium period under IBC. Income Tax Authorities are like creditors and may stake their claim before the liquidator or adjudicatory authority within the statutory limitation period under the waterfall mechanism of IBC. However, they are not barred from determining the tax dues for staking claims. CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the issue on merit regarding determination of tax dues, despite the pendency of liquidation process. The case deserves to be restored to CIT(A) for disposal on merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
