Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Petitioners sought condonation of delay in filing belated annual returns and balance sheets without paying additional fees. The Court held that despite the existence of a scheme for condonation of delay, it had not extended the benefit to the Petitioners in its previous order dated 11.02.2021. The Court had only directed restoration of the Petitioners' names subject to payment of requisite fees, implying late fees. The Petitioners cannot now seek relief not granted in the previous order. They must pay the late fees for restoration of their names. The petition was dismissed.
Petitioners sought condonation of delay in filing belated annual returns and balance sheets without paying additional fees. The Court held that despite the existence of a scheme for condonation of delay, it had not extended the benefit to the Petitioners in its previous order dated 11.02.2021. The Court had only directed restoration of the Petitioners' names subject to payment of requisite fees, implying late fees. The Petitioners cannot now seek relief not granted in the previous order. They must pay the late fees for restoration of their names. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
