Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
